Who can provide a link to official documentation of:
Individuals who voted "yes" on the funding for this effort?
Individuals who voted "yes" to approve this particular logo/brand?
Individuals who voted "no" to either?
This will definitely affect my voting decisions in future.
Because:
1. $22K in THIS economy for a logo/branding effort is absolutely inappropriate.
2. This logo is inappropriate.
Thanks,
Cypher
Some good questions, Cypher. Alas, I do not have the answers you seek. I do, however, have a list of things I could get for $22,000 that would be far more practical and/or more fun than a logo.
A car
44,000 canned food items in donation to a local food bank
Fully paid 4 year state college education for THREE children
A boob job for me and two friends
1/3 of a house from Habitat for Humanity
The annual property tax assessment for all of my friends on my street.
A pair of earrings from Tiffany
18,857 bottles of Shiner Bock Beer
But, you know, I suppose that's the going price for a logo nowadays.