So sorry, but no savings in labor.
Ok, so there's no savings in labor because they're choosing to go with an inefficient system that requires extra manpower. Gotcha.
So given that, you've still got the weekly pickup vs. semi-weekly, so that should only reduce the cost by half?
When I lived in Garland we were encouraged to not tie up the bags tight. It allowed more trash in the bins (no air pockets) and it promoted the decomposing process.
When I lived in Garland they just had one dude on each garbage route and a truck that could reach out and pick up the bins without manual intervention. I'd be interested to see how many saved man-hours it takes to justify the cost of the equipment upgrade.
We will have recycling - GOOD.
It takes more energy and creates more pollution to recycle things than it does to place it in a landfill.
Also, modern technology has evolved to the point where landfills are actually helpful, as they serve as a source of natural gas power which is far cleaner burning than fossil fuels.
The only thing it makes any sense to recycle is aluminum cans. Everything else, glass, paper (especially paper; recycling paper kills more trees than making new paper from tree farms does), plastic, most kinds of metals, and everything else you are told to recycle is (probably well-intentioned) propaganda.
Another GOOD, is that with 1 time per week trash and 1 time per week recycling we will not be increasing the number of trips that the large trucks take down our streets. Those trucks are hard on the streets.
How much more life should we expect from the streets by moving to weekly pickups? I mean, your statement seems reasonable, but I'm not sure how significant a contribution over the normal life of the road we're talking about. Most of the neighborhoods we're talking about have concrete streets, not black top.
Another really GOOOOOOD thing is that the service is staying with the local company and not going to some big conglomerate out of Dallas.
I'm all for supporting local business, but when we're talking about how to spend the citizen's money, the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few (and if you think I got that from Star Trek you're very very wrong.)
If a big Dallas conglomerate can do it better/faster/cheaper for the people of Anna then I think that's something we should at least give some consideration.