Author Topic: Mandatory Vaccinations 2009  (Read 3758 times)

Offline Livia

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 288
Mandatory Vaccinations 2009
« on: July 12, 2009, 06:53:58 PM »
Mandatory Vaccinations 2009 ... anyone have some thoughts on this?

Offline Livia

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 288
Re: Mandatory Vaccinations 2009
« Reply #1 on: July 12, 2009, 07:00:23 PM »
Natural News Article ~

Children and Pregnant Women Targeted in U.S. Swine Flu Mass Vaccination Program

Mike Adams
Natural News
Fri, 10 Jul 2009

The U.S. government is about to unleash a sweeping new vaccination program that claims to protect people from swine flu. The vaccines, which are of course completely useless against any mutated strain of the H1N1 influenza virus, are nevertheless quite useful at suppressing the immune function of those who receive them. Well-designed medical studies conducted over the years have consistently shown that the people who catch the flu (influenza) with the greatest frequency are precisely those who get the most flu shots.

To those who know anything about the immune system, vaccines and influenza, it may seem shocking to learn that the U.S. influenza vaccine program will first target those with the weakest immune systems to begin with: Toddlers as young as six months old, pregnant women and adults with degenerative disease. This is precisely what Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius announced today.

Why is the swine flu vaccine targeting those least likely to need it?

It's all quite fascinating from a public health point of view, of course, especially since the U.S. government already announced the swine flu was "mild" and that it only really attacked those with healthy immune systems, not weak immune systems. So why is the first wave of vaccines now targeting the very children and adults who are least likely to be impacted by swine flu infections in the first place?

The answer, of course, is that swine flu vaccines have nothing to do with public health and everything to do with generating billions of dollars in profits for Big Pharma. For the drug companies to rake in all this money manufacturing vaccines, they obviously have to give the shots to somebody -- just to create the illusion that something productive might be going on in order to justify the government expenditures. It's a lot like war budgets: You gotta drop bombs on somebody in order to justify making new ones.

So the vaccines are dropping little viral bombs on precisely those citizens least able to fend for themselves: Children, pregnant women, senile seniors and adults suffering from chronic disease... these are the new "targets" of the U.S. government's mass vaccination program.

Note that they have deliberately avoided targeting the people most capable of speaking out and saying no to dangerous vaccines: Healthy young couples and middle-aged individuals who aren't victims of modern medicine.

Baxter inserts live flu viruses into vaccine materials (google this article to read)

Meanwhile, the pharmaceutical factories are churning out huge doses of the swine flu vaccine: 100 million doses will reportedly be available for injection into victims by mid-October.

Curiously, one of the companies being contracted to manufacture this vaccine is Baxter International, the very same company that was caught late last year inserting live influenza viruses into vaccine materials distributed to 18 countries. Apparently, this company has already perfected the techniques for infecting vaccines with live viruses, and now the U.S. government has contracted with Baxter to help manufacture hundreds of millions of doses of swine flu vaccines to be injected into infants, pregnant women and chronically diseased adults.

Offline militarydave

  • Captain Awesome Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1321
Re: Mandatory Vaccinations 2009
« Reply #2 on: July 13, 2009, 01:05:31 AM »
I wouldn't sweat it. 2 weeks in cancun with masks and SPF 50 and i'm still alive. thanks for giving me my avatar idea.
 ;D
My favorite sex position is the Toyota - I wont stop no matter how loud you scream!!

And I don't trust anything that bleeds for five days and doesn't die!

Offline dogfart

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 148
  • We want information!
Re: Mandatory Vaccinations 2009
« Reply #3 on: July 13, 2009, 08:06:55 AM »
This is why I use a condom with livestock.
Swine flu is nothing compared poultry crabs.

Offline Lady L

  • Captain Awesome Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1090
Re: Mandatory Vaccinations 2009
« Reply #4 on: July 13, 2009, 08:13:02 AM »
Is this Mike a medical doctor?

Offline dogfart

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 148
  • We want information!
Re: Mandatory Vaccinations 2009
« Reply #5 on: July 13, 2009, 08:20:08 AM »
Is this Mike a medical doctor?
Nope, just some BS naturalist pushing his ' be healthy & happy' agenda across the net.

Offline d_huntress

  • Captain Awesome Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1973
    • Change Your Coffee; Change Your Life.
Re: Mandatory Vaccinations 2009
« Reply #6 on: July 16, 2009, 10:50:38 AM »
I fight mandatory vaccines for several additional reasons.

(1) Why give my 27 pound child the same flu vaccine you give to an adult? One size does NOT fit all. They do split the vaccine into (2) 6-month injections, but only when they are infants.

(2) No where can you find the "standards" used to regulate the amount of aluminum added to these vaccines. Every vaccine contains aluminum, because aluminum is the substance that triggers the body's immediate & intense immune reaction to the dead virus. Aluminum has been studied for years now and been shown to lead to Alzheimer's disease.

(3) The aluminum has to be diluted into the adjuvant in order to combine with the vaccine. Adjuvants is defined as: A pharmacological agent added to a drug to increase or aid its effect. The substances used as diluting agents are peanut oil, tree nut oil, casein (from milk), soy oil, sesame oil and fish oils. SUPPOSEDLY, these oils are processed at a high enough temperature to destroy the proteins that cause catastrophic allergic reactions --- but again, vaccine manufacturers will not supply proof of even which oil is used in their adjuvant. If a tiny amount of protein is left, then the aluminum will trigger the body to make IgE (Immunoglobulin E) in response to the protein as well as to the dead virus. Anybody wonder why the instances of childhood food allergies correlates with the timing of increased vaccination schedules after 1990?

I admit, I was bullied into believing that vaccines were the best thing for my child, and now she has a life-threatening allergy to peanuts and tree nuts. I can't tell you how heart-breaking it is to see how many girls have gotten sick or died from the Gardasil vaccine. We (Americans) are the most vaccinated people on the planet --- and the most unhealthy.
Ask me how I can help you feel your best.

Online drax0r

  • Major FANTASTIC Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3433
  • Muckraker Extraordinaire
    • Anna Texas Community Forum
Re: Mandatory Vaccinations 2009
« Reply #7 on: July 16, 2009, 11:28:01 AM »

I heart polio.
Everything I say, do, imply, or infer is the sole representation and responsibility of the individual who owns this account and does not represent the opinion, policy, position, or intent of any organization or other entity, public or private.

Offline d_huntress

  • Captain Awesome Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1973
    • Change Your Coffee; Change Your Life.
Re: Mandatory Vaccinations 2009
« Reply #8 on: July 16, 2009, 11:50:00 AM »

I heart polio.

Calcium phosphate adjuvant [rather than Aluminium phosphate or aluminium hydroxide (alum)] has been used for simultaneous vaccination with diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, polio, BCG, yellow fever, measles and hepatitis B vaccines (Coursaget et al., 1986). The advantage of this adjuvant has been seen to be that it is a normal constituent of the body and is better tolerated and absorbed than other adjuvants. It entraps antigens very efficiently and allows slow release of the antigen. I have no idea why Calcium phosphate can't be used in all vaccines --- except that it must be financial. From what I have read, the stronger aluminum adjuvant allows the manufacturer to use far less of the actual antigen - thus stretching their supply of antigen, making more vaccines and of course, more money.

NOT ALL VACCINES ARE CREATED EQUAL.
Ask me how I can help you feel your best.

Offline d_huntress

  • Captain Awesome Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1973
    • Change Your Coffee; Change Your Life.
Re: Mandatory Vaccinations 2009
« Reply #9 on: July 16, 2009, 11:59:23 AM »
ADVERSE EFFECTS OF ADJUVANTS IN VACCINES
by Viera Scheibner, Ph.D. Ó 2000

"The conclusions which follow the study of relevant medical and immunological literature dealing with vaccines and the adjuvants used in vaccines is that the absolute safety of these substances can never be guaranteed. According to Gupta et al. (1993), the toxicity of adjuvants can be ascribed in part to the unintended stimulation of various mechanisms of the immune response. That’s why the safety and adjuvancy must be balanced to get the maximum immune stimulation with minimum side effects.

The conclusion is that such balance is impossible to achieve, even if we fully understood the immune system and the full spectrum of the effects of foreign antigens and other toxic substances such as vaccine and drug adjuvants and medications on the immune system of humans, and particularly on the immature immune system of babies and small children. Injecting any foreign substance straight into the bloodstream will only cause anaphylactic (sensitisation) reactions.

Nature, over thousands and thousands of years, has developed effective immune responses; yet man, without respect for nature, demonstrably causes more harm than good.

Vaccination procedures are a highly politically motivated non-science, whose practitioners are only interested in injecting multitudes of vaccines without much interest or care as to their effects. Data collection on reactions to vaccines is only paid lip service, and the obvious ineffectiveness of vaccines to prevent diseases is glossed over.

The fact that natural infectious diseases have beneficial effect on the maturation and development of the immune system is ignored or deliberately suppressed.

Consequently, parents of small children and any potential recipients of vaccines and any orthodox medications should be wary of any member of the medical establishment (which is little more than a highly politicised business system) extolling the non-existent virtues of vaccination."
Ask me how I can help you feel your best.

Offline jhenning

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 691
  • ...But I, I took the one less traveled by.
Re: Mandatory Vaccinations 2009
« Reply #10 on: July 16, 2009, 01:12:41 PM »
Quote
Vaccination procedures are a highly politically motivated non-science, whose practitioners are only interested in injecting multitudes of vaccines without much interest or care as to their effects. Data collection on reactions to vaccines is only paid lip service, and the obvious ineffectiveness of vaccines to prevent diseases is glossed over.


I do wonder about this--My son was vaccinated for chicken pox, yet he got the illness THREE times.  The last time was a case like his pediatrician said she had not seen in over 10 years.

--Jamie

Offline d_huntress

  • Captain Awesome Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1973
    • Change Your Coffee; Change Your Life.
Re: Mandatory Vaccinations 2009
« Reply #11 on: July 16, 2009, 01:39:16 PM »
I got the chicken pox at age 6 the old fashioned way. It was a rough week for me and my family, but I got over it. My uncle, however, did not catch chickenpox until he was in college, and it put him in the hospital. Why give a vaccine that will be effective only through the years when the virus does the least amount of harm? I'm sorry, jhenning, to hear about your son's recurring episodes.

My posts here are wishful thinking that the medical community will soon open their eyes. Chicken pox lasts a week. My child's severe allergy will be with her for her whole life. I can't say for sure, of course, that it was the chicken pox vaccine that contributed to her peanut & tree nut allergies ---- but I also can't say it was not.
Ask me how I can help you feel your best.

Offline ehowton

  • Colonel COURAGEOUS Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 7595
  • Fingering the Muse
    • http://ehowton.livejournal.com
Re: Mandatory Vaccinations 2009
« Reply #12 on: July 16, 2009, 01:46:39 PM »
My posts here are wishful thinking that the medical community will soon open their eyes.

Sadly, many in the world are motivated only by greed, which means they're likely aware of the situation, they just don't care, and that a much larger problem.

Offline militarydave

  • Captain Awesome Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1321
Re: Mandatory Vaccinations 2009
« Reply #13 on: July 16, 2009, 01:52:16 PM »
yeah well once you get it its fine. like any other disease... just tell your partner(s) you're infected with the  (insert virus name)virus.

i would say it after you've acheived what you were wanting to do in the first place. it doesn't work so well before hand.

-dave
My favorite sex position is the Toyota - I wont stop no matter how loud you scream!!

And I don't trust anything that bleeds for five days and doesn't die!

Offline RedHighHeels

  • Major FANTASTIC Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3550
  • You cannot put the same shoe on every foot...
Re: Mandatory Vaccinations 2009
« Reply #14 on: July 16, 2009, 01:58:49 PM »
I got the live virus Yellow Fever vaccine when I was pregnant with D (military mix up).  She is the only one of my children with no food allergies...

I tend to believe that what happens will happen.  I make the best choices I can with all the information that I can find.  That is the best each of us can do.  That, and not to judge the decisions that others make, to each his own.
I am sarcastic and have a smart ass attitude.  It's a natural defense against drama, bullshit, and stupidity...